Qualysec
Blog

Top 5 Penetration Testing Services Providers in Australia (2026 Buyer’s Guide)

Looking for quality penetration testing services in Australia? Qualysec offers comprehensive solutions to safeguard your digital assets.

Updated on September 9, 2026
Read Time: 29 min
CONNECT WITH US

Choosing a penetration testing company in Australia isn’t just about finding a vendor who can run a vulnerability scan and send back a PDF. Decision-makers, such as CISOs, heads of security, and operations leaders, need to weigh testing depth, CREST accreditation, Australian delivery and data-handling requirements, sector compliance experience (APRA, Essential Eight, PCI DSS), reporting quality, and whether retesting is included in the price.

This guide compares the leading penetration testing companies serving Australian organisations in 2026. It explains what each provider is genuinely best at, what kind of buyer they suit, what to verify before signing, and how the market evaluates “top” providers in the first place, including where our own company, Qualysec, fits and where it doesn’t.

There is no single best penetration testing provider for every organisation. A CREST-accredited local firm may be the right call for an APRA-regulated bank. A specialist AI/API testing shop may be the better fit for a fast-moving SaaS company. This guide is built to help you match the provider to the buyer, not the other way around.

Quick Answer: Best Penetration Testing Companies in Australia

Rank Company Best For Australian Presence CREST Accredited Typical Engagement Model
1 Qualysec Best-fit segment for SaaS, AI, Fintech, Edtech and other product/service companies wanting deep manual testing Head office in India, but cater global clients YES, CREST Accredited company Human-led AI  VAPT + retesting
2 Tesserent Enterprise and government, broad managed security portfolio Australian offices (multi-city) YES (CREST approved organisation) Consulting-led engagements
3 CyberCX Large enterprise, critical infrastructure, government Largest Australian-headquartered team Yes (CREST approved organisation) End-to-end scoping to remediation support
4 Content Security Mid-market and enterprise, long-standing local reputation Australian-owned, Melbourne-based Yes (CREST approved organisation) Manual testing + advisory
5 NCC Group Global enterprise, complex/regulated environments International firm with Australian delivery Yes (globally accredited) Structured, standards-aligned methodology

How We Evaluated These Penetration Testing Companies

To keep this comparison useful rather than promotional, every company below was assessed against the same criteria:

Criteria What we looked at
Accreditation CREST (ANZ or International) or other recognised accreditation
Testing capability Web, API, mobile, cloud, network, IoT, AI/LLM, red team
Manual testing depth Human-led exploitation vs automated/scanner-driven testing
Australian presence Local offices, testers, and delivery vs remote/offshore delivery
Industry experience Finance, healthcare, SaaS, government, critical infrastructure
Compliance expertise APRA CPS 234, Essential Eight, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, SOCI Act
Reporting quality Technical detail + executive summary + evidence of exploitation
Retesting Whether remediation validation is included or charged separately
Pricing transparency Public pricing, indicative ranges, or clear pricing signals
Best fit SME, mid-market, enterprise, government, regulated industries

Disclosure: Qualysec is included in this list and is the publisher of this article. We’ve applied the same criteria to ourselves as to every other provider, including where we fall short of a “local Australian” delivery model; see the transparency note in our own profile below.

The Australian Penetration Testing Market: What Buyers Should Know

Australian organisations are testing more, and testing under more regulatory pressure, than they were even 2 years ago. A few dynamics matter for anyone shortlisting a provider:

  • Regulatory pressure is rising: APRA-regulated entities, government agencies, and critical infrastructure operators increasingly face explicit or implicit expectations around independent security testing, and procurement teams are starting to ask for CREST accreditation as a baseline qualification rather than a nice-to-have.
  • The market is unregulated at the entry level: Anyone can call themselves a “penetration tester” in Australia as there’s no licensing requirement. That’s exactly why accreditation (CREST), named methodologies, and evidence of manual exploitation matter so much when comparing providers.
  • Local delivery is not automatically better, but it changes the conversation: Some organizations, particularly APRA-regulated entities and government buyers, have explicit or implicit preferences for onshore testers and Australian data handling. Others are entirely comfortable with a remote or offshore delivery model as long as data handling and confidentiality terms are clear. So, always ask, don’t assume.
  • Pricing has become more transparent: Several providers now publish indicative pricing ranges rather than requiring a sales call for a ballpark figure. It has become a trend worth following if you want your own pricing page or article to perform well.

Top Penetration Testing Companies in Australia

Qualysec Technologies 

Qualysec - Cybersecurity Consulting Company

  • Best for: SaaS companies, technology businesses, fintech, healthcare, AI-driven applications, and organisations looking for specialist penetration testing with manual testing, compliance support, and flexible engagement options.
  • Australian presence: Qualysec serves Australian organisations remotely. Its website currently lists offices in Bhubaneswar and Bengaluru, India, rather than a physical Australian office. 
  • Accreditation: CREST-accredited penetration testing company, with additional ISO 27001, ISO 9001:2015, and ISO 13485 certifications listed on its website. 
  • Primary services: Web application, mobile application, API, desktop application, cloud, network, IoT, source code review, enterprise application, and AI/LLM application security testing. 
  • Testing approach: Human-led penetration testing supported by OWASP, NIST, SANS, OSSTMM, and PTES methodologies. Its published packages include grey-box testing, authentication and business logic testing, vulnerability fixing support, reporting, and unlimited retesting. 
  • Industries served: Fintech, healthcare, SaaS, technology, e-commerce, e-learning, energy, government and public sector, telecommunications, BFSI, and AI-driven applications. 
  • Compliance expertise: SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, NIST, CIS Controls, FDA cybersecurity requirements, and other industry-specific requirements. 
  • Pricing: Quote-based. Qualysec publishes packaged penetration testing plans on its website, including annual Business and Enterprise options, but final pricing is provided through a quote. 

Why it stands out:

Qualysec positions itself specifically around advanced penetration testing rather than as a general-purpose managed security provider. Its website states that the company has 6+ years of experience and has completed 2,500+ assessments. Its current service range covers web, mobile, API, desktop, cloud, network, IoT, source code, enterprise applications, and AI/LLM security. 

The company is also CREST-accredited for penetration testing, alongside ISO 27001, ISO 9001:2015, and ISO 13485 certifications. Its published testing approach references OWASP and NIST, while its pricing packages additionally list SANS, OSSTMM, and PTES. 

Qualysec provides a sample penetration testing report and publishes compliance-focused testing options for standards and regulations including SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, and FDA cybersecurity requirements. The company also states that its pentest reports support more than 52 compliance requirements worldwide. 

Its website lists clients including Konica Minolta, Revvity, OneShield, Flydocs, Wonderla, Zee Media, CloudBolt and Insider. It also states that its services cover organisations ranging from startups to global enterprises. 

Things to consider

  • Qualysec does not currently list a physical Australian office on its website, so Australian customers should confirm delivery arrangements, time-zone coverage, data handling, and communication expectations before engaging. 
  • Published pricing is package-based but still requires a quote, so buyers should confirm the final scope and inclusions before comparing costs directly with other providers. 

Best suited for: SaaS, technology, fintech, healthcare, and other organisations that want a penetration-testing-focused provider with CREST accreditation, broad testing coverage, and compliance-oriented reporting.

Australian market availability: Qualysec serves Australian organisations remotely. Its website currently lists offices in Bhubaneswar and Bengaluru, India, and does not list a physical Australian office. 

Need a Penetration Test?

Talk directly with Qualysec’s senior security experts. Book a quick call or grab a quote today.

Get a Quote

Pentest Quote

Tesserent (a Thales company)

Thales

  • Best for: Government, defence, critical infrastructure, and large enterprises requiring cyber security services across applications, data, identities, infrastructure, detection and response, and offensive security.
  • Australian presence: Strong Australian presence through Thales Cyber Services Australia, with its Australian headquarters listed at 80 Collins Street, Melbourne. The company states that it has 300+ cyber customers in Australia and 500+ cyber experts across Australia and New Zealand
  • Accreditation: The Thales Cyber Services Australia website does not provide a single consolidated list of penetration testing accreditations on the referenced page, so specific certifications should be confirmed for the individual engagement.
  • Primary services: Application and penetration testing, infrastructure penetration testing, IoT and OT penetration testing, physical testing, social engineering, adversary simulation, kiosk reviews, OWASP Top 10 application security training, cyber incident first responder training, consulting, detection and response, and critical infrastructure resilience services. 
  • Testing approach: Offensive security testing covering applications, infrastructure, IoT, OT, physical environments, and social engineering. Its IoT/OT testing methodology is aligned with the OWASP IoT Top 10 and ASD Secure-by-Design principles. 
  • Industries served: Defence, public sector, critical infrastructure, enterprise, and organisations requiring protection for applications, data, identities, and critical systems. 
  • Compliance expertise: Thales Cyber Services provides cyber security consulting, assessments, critical infrastructure resilience, and security services, but the referenced Australian website does not provide enough information to attribute a complete list of specific compliance frameworks to its penetration testing offering.
  • Pricing: Quote-based. No public penetration testing pricing is listed.

Why it stands out:

Thales Cyber Services combines offensive security testing with a much broader cyber security operation. Its Australian website states that the organisation has 300+ cyber customers in Australia, more than 500 cyber experts across Australia and New Zealand, and a 24/7/365 sovereign Cyber Security Operations Centre. It also cites more than 30 years of experience delivering cyber and digital services to thousands of customers. 

Its Offensive Security Services portfolio covers application and infrastructure penetration testing as well as physical testing, social engineering, IoT and OT penetration testing, kiosk reviews, and adversary simulation. This breadth is particularly relevant for organisations where the attack surface extends beyond conventional web applications and corporate networks. 

Thales also publishes a dedicated IoT/OT testing capability based on the OWASP IoT Top 10 and ASD Secure-by-Design principles. This gives the provider a defined testing approach for connected devices and operational technology environments. 

At the global level, Thales states that its cyber security organisation includes 6,000 cybersecurity professionals, with more than 30,000 cybersecurity customers worldwide

Things to consider

  • Thales Cyber Services operates as a broad cyber security and technology organisation, so penetration testing is one component of a larger service portfolio. 
  • Organisations seeking a smaller specialist penetration testing provider should compare engagement structure, tester allocation, and commercial requirements before choosing. 

Best suited for: Defence, government, critical infrastructure, and large enterprises that need penetration testing as part of a wider cyber security and resilience programme.

Australian market availability: Thales Cyber Services Australia has a direct Australian presence, with its listed Australian address in Melbourne and a wider Australia/New Zealand cyber security team of 500+ experts. 

CyberCX

CyberCX

  • Best for: Enterprise and government organisations looking for broad penetration testing and security assurance capabilities across applications, networks, physical environments, OT, cloud and AI.
  • Australian presence: Strong local presence across Australia, with CyberCX positioning itself as an Australian cyber security and cloud partner. Its security testing team provides localised testing and guidance for Australian organisations. 
  • Accreditation: CREST-accredited testing capability, with CyberCX stating that its testing experts are independently assessed and certified by CREST. Its security testing team also includes SANS/GIAC and CREST-accredited testers. 
  • Primary services: Web application, web services/API, external and internal network, mobile, wireless, OT, social engineering, physical, thick client, OSINT, hardware/embedded/IoT, AI, SAP and objective-based penetration testing. 
  • Testing approach: A four-step methodology covering reconnaissance, prioritisation and planning, exploitation, and reporting/remediation. CyberCX combines automated technologies with specialist manual testing techniques and uses frameworks including NIST, PTES, CREST and OWASP. 
  • Industries served: CyberCX states that it works with enterprise and government organisations and has testing experience across all sectors. Its published customer stories include energy, logistics and transport, and not-for-profit organisations. 
  • Compliance expertise: PCI DSS, ISO 27001 and NIST, alongside CREST and OWASP-aligned security testing. 
  • Pricing: Quote-based, with pricing determined by the objectives, scope, size and complexity of the environment. CyberCX does not publish a standard penetration testing price. 

Why it stands out:

CyberCX has one of the larger security testing operations in the Australian market. Its website states that the organisation has more than 1,400 cyber security and cloud professionals, while its dedicated Security Testing and Assurance team includes more than 170 full-time testers and experts in application and infrastructure security. CyberCX also says its ethical hackers conduct more than 3,000 ethical hacking penetration tests per year and its teams perform more than 500 baseline security assessments annually. 

Its penetration testing offering extends well beyond conventional web and network assessments. The company lists testing for mobile applications, APIs, wireless networks, OT environments, physical security, social engineering, IoT and embedded systems, AI and SAP. Its methodology combines reconnaissance and threat prioritisation with exploitation, followed by risk-based reporting and remediation recommendations. 

CyberCX also publishes customer success stories and says it has tested thousands of networks, systems and applications across industry and government. Its testing standards and frameworks include NIST, PTES, CREST, OWASP, ASVS and CWE/SANS Top 25. 

Things to consider

  • CyberCX is positioned primarily around enterprise, government and larger-scale security requirements, so smaller organisations should confirm that its engagement model and scope are appropriate for their needs. 
  • The company offers a very broad range of cyber security services beyond penetration testing, so buyers looking specifically for a specialist penetration-testing boutique may want to compare the level of dedicated testing focus across shortlisted providers. 

Best suited for: Enterprise and government organisations that need CREST-backed penetration testing alongside broader security testing, assurance and cyber security capabilities.

Australian market availability: CyberCX has a substantial Australian presence and explicitly positions its security testing services around Australian organisations, with localised expertise and delivery.

Content Security

Content Security

  • Best for: Australian organisations looking for an end-to-end cyber security partner covering security consulting, testing, managed security and governance rather than penetration testing alone.
  • Australian presence: Australian-based company with offices listed in Sydney and Melbourne on its website. 
  • Accreditation: The current Content Security website does not provide enough accessible information to verify a specific penetration-testing accreditation, so none is listed here.
  • Primary services: Cyber security consulting and managed security services, with the company positioned around security, cloud and related cyber security capabilities. The website’s current accessible content does not provide enough detail to reliably reproduce a complete penetration-testing service catalogue.
  • Testing approach: The current website does not publish enough accessible information to verify a named penetration-testing methodology, so no specific methodology is attributed to Content Security here.
  • Industries served: Australian organisations and businesses. The company states that its security experts help businesses find the right security solution. 
  • Compliance expertise: The current website does not provide enough accessible information to verify a complete list of compliance frameworks, so specific standards are not attributed here.
  • Pricing: Quote-based. No public penetration testing pricing is listed on the website.

Why it stands out:

Content Security has been operating in the Australian cyber security market for more than two decades, with its website currently positioning the business around cyber security services and expert support for Australian organisations. Its contact page lists offices in Sydney and Melbourne and describes the company as providing security expertise to businesses. 

The company is therefore better viewed as a broader cyber security consultancy and services provider rather than a penetration-testing-only specialist. For buyers comparing providers, this distinction matters because Content Security’s offering extends into wider security requirements rather than being centred exclusively on offensive security testing.

Its Australian footprint is also straightforward to verify from its website, which currently lists a Sydney office at Ultimo and a Melbourne office in the CBD. This gives organisations looking for an Australia-based security provider a clearly stated local point of contact. 

Things to consider

  • The current website does not provide enough publicly accessible information to independently verify specific penetration-testing methodologies, tester certifications or accreditation claims. 
  • Buyers specifically comparing CREST-accredited penetration testing providers should confirm Content Security’s current accreditation status and testing credentials directly before shortlisting it. 

Best suited for: Australian businesses looking for a broader cyber security consultancy and managed-services relationship rather than a provider focused exclusively on penetration testing.

Australian market availability: Content Security is an Australian-based provider with offices listed in Sydney and Melbourne and provides services to Australian organisations. 

NCC Group

NCC Group

  • Best for: Large enterprises, regulated organisations and technology companies needing specialist penetration testing, application security, attack simulation and broader technical assurance.
  • Australian presence: NCC Group has an established Australian presence and lists Australia among its office locations. Its APAC operation provides local delivery alongside its global delivery capabilities. 
  • Accreditation: CREST Member Company, with CHECK, CREST and OSCP-certified consultants. NCC Group also holds multiple NCSC accreditations and states that its Information Security Management System is certified to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 across Australia and other operating regions. 
  • Primary services: Network penetration testing, web and application penetration testing, mobile application testing, native/compiled application testing, social engineering, cloud security, hardware and embedded security, attack simulation, continuous penetration testing, code review and application security assessments
  • Testing approach: Hands-on penetration testing supported by threat intelligence, vulnerability research and real-world attack experience. NCC Group also offers continuous penetration testing that combines AI and human expertise and integrates testing into development environments and workflows. 
  • Industries served: Financial services, legal and professional services, retail and consumer markets, public sector and government, transport, technology/media/telecommunications, energy/utilities and manufacturing, among others. 
  • Compliance expertise: CREST, CHECK, NCSC, CBEST, PCI DSS, ISO 9001 and ISO/IEC 27001, with additional regulatory and assurance capabilities depending on the service. 
  • Pricing: Flexible engagement models including fixed costs, day rates and continuous testing models. Specific pricing is quote-based. 

Why it stands out:

NCC Group brings more than 25 years of cyber security experience and a global network of more than 2,000 colleagues. Its technical assurance practice covers penetration testing alongside application security, attack simulation, hardware and embedded security, cloud security, cryptography, blockchain security and network infrastructure testing. 

Its penetration testing capability is supported by certified consultants, including CHECK, CREST and OSCP professionals. NCC Group also describes its services as intelligence-led, drawing on security research, threat intelligence and experience handling real-world threat actors. 

The company has also moved beyond traditional point-in-time assessments with its Continuous Penetration Testing offering. This integrates security testing into development environments and covers web applications, APIs and microservices, mobile applications, authentication and business logic, and CI/CD pipelines. 

NCC Group’s published customer work includes organisations such as TikTok, Vodafone and Transport for London, while its Australian operation has supported penetration testing for a global organisation headquartered in Australia. 

Things to consider

  • NCC Group operates at a global enterprise scale, so smaller organisations should confirm whether its engagement model, scope and commercial structure fit their requirements. 
  • Its broad cyber security portfolio means organisations looking only for a small, specialist penetration-testing engagement may want to compare its delivery model with more focused testing firms. 

Best suited for: Large enterprises, regulated organisations and technology companies that need specialist offensive security testing backed by global research, certifications and broader technical assurance capabilities.

Australian market availability: NCC Group has offices in Australia and provides local APAC delivery backed by its global cyber security network.

CREST vs IRAP vs Essential Eight: What Buyers Need to Know

These 3 terms get used interchangeably by buyers, but they shouldn’t be.

CREST is an independent, not-for-profit accreditation body (CREST ANZ locally, CREST International globally) that certifies both organisations and individual testers against defined technical and professional competency standards. CREST accreditation is a signal about the quality and rigour of the testing provider itself. It is not a compliance requirement in Australian law, but it is increasingly referenced by APRA-regulated entities and government procurement as a baseline vendor qualification.

IRAP (Infosec Registered Assessors Program) is an Australian Signals Directorate program that assesses systems, particularly government and cloud systems, against the Australian Government’s security requirements. IRAP is not the same as a penetration test and is not something every provider offers; if a government or cloud-hosting engagement specifically requires IRAP assessment, confirm the provider has IRAP-assessed personnel, not just general security testing capability.

Essential Eight is the Australian Cyber Security Centre’s baseline set of mitigation strategies (application control, patching, restricting admin privileges, multi-factor authentication, and others). Essential Eight maturity assessments are a distinct exercise from penetration testing, though many organisations commission both. A penetration test can help validate whether Essential Eight controls are actually effective in practice, but it is not itself an Essential Eight maturity assessment.

In short, CREST tells you the provider is credible. IRAP tells you a system has been assessed against government requirements. Essential Eight tells you how mature an organisation’s baseline controls are. Don’t assume one substitutes for another.

Australian Penetration Testing Requirements, Regulations, and Security Frameworks

Penetration testing in Australia is influenced by several cybersecurity regulations, standards, and security frameworks, rather than one universal penetration testing law. The testing requirements that apply to an organisation depend on its industry, regulatory obligations, data handled, and the systems being protected. Some frameworks require specific testing activities or frequencies, while others expect organisations to demonstrate that security controls are effective through appropriate assessment and assurance.

Below are the key Australian penetration testing requirements and compliance frameworks organisations should consider:

  • APRA CPS 234: Information Security

APRA CPS 234 applies to APRA-regulated entities, including organisations in banking, insurance and superannuation. It requires regulated entities to maintain information security capabilities and systematically test the effectiveness of their information security controls. Testing must be performed by appropriately skilled and functionally independent specialists. 

APRA does not prescribe one penetration testing schedule for every organisation. Instead, the frequency and scope of security testing must be proportionate to factors such as changing threats and vulnerabilities, the criticality and sensitivity of information assets, exposure to untrusted environments, and changes to IT assets. APRA guidance indicates that a sufficient set of controls should generally be tested at least annually, with controls protecting internet-facing or otherwise untrusted environments typically tested throughout the year. 

What this means for penetration testing: APRA-regulated organisations should use independent security testing as part of a documented control-testing and assurance program, with the scope and frequency based on risk.

  • Essential Eight and Essential Eight Maturity Model

The Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) Essential Eight is a baseline cybersecurity framework designed to help organisations protect internet-connected IT networks against common cyber threats. It includes eight mitigation strategies covering areas such as application and operating system patching, multifactor authentication, privileged access, application control, Office macros, application hardening, and backups. 

The Essential Eight is not itself a general penetration testing mandate. However, ASD’s Essential Eight assessment guidance provides methods for assessing the implementation and effectiveness of the controls, and ASD separately recognises vulnerability assessments and penetration testing as security assessment activities. 

For Australian Government organisations, the Essential Eight can form part of mandatory security requirements under applicable government policies. ASD currently recommends organisations use the latest Essential Eight Maturity Model and adopt an appropriate maturity level based on their risk and threat environment. 

What this means for penetration testing: Organisations can use penetration testing and vulnerability assessments alongside Essential Eight assessments to identify exploitable weaknesses and validate the effectiveness of security controls.

  • PCI DSS Penetration Testing Requirements

Organisations that store, process, or transmit payment card data may need to comply with the PCI DSS penetration testing requirements. PCI DSS requires applicable penetration testing to be performed at least annually and after significant changes to the environment. Depending on the organisation and its implementation, additional testing requirements can apply. 

PCI DSS distinguishes penetration testing from vulnerability scanning. A penetration test is intended to determine whether vulnerabilities can actually be exploited to circumvent or defeat security controls, rather than simply identifying and ranking vulnerabilities. 

What this means for penetration testing: Australian organisations within PCI DSS scope should plan penetration testing around the applicable PCI DSS requirements, including annual testing and testing following significant changes.

  • Privacy Act 1988 and Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme

The Australian Privacy Act 1988 does not prescribe a specific penetration testing frequency. However, Australian Privacy Principle (APP) 11 requires covered organisations to take reasonable steps to protect personal information from misuse, interference, loss, and unauthorised access, modification, or disclosure. What constitutes reasonable security depends on factors including the organisation, the information it holds, and the associated risks. 

The Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) scheme also requires covered organisations to assess suspected eligible data breaches and notify affected individuals and the OAIC when the relevant conditions are met. 

What this means for penetration testing: Penetration testing can form part of a broader security program used to identify and address weaknesses that could expose personal information. It should not, however, be presented as a specific penetration testing requirement under the Privacy Act.

  • SOCI Act: Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018

The Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI Act) establishes cyber and security obligations for owners and operators of certain critical infrastructure assets. Depending on the asset and applicable obligations, entities may need to maintain a written risk management program, report certain cyber incidents, and meet additional security requirements. 

For Systems of National Significance (SoNS), the Enhanced Cyber Security Obligations can include requirements relating to incident response plans, cyber security exercises, vulnerability assessments, and maintaining information needed for a near-real-time threat picture. 

What this means for penetration testing: Critical infrastructure organisations should determine which SOCI obligations apply to their assets and use appropriate vulnerability assessments, penetration testing, exercises, and other security assurance activities where required by their risk management and regulatory obligations.

  • ISO/IEC 27001

ISO/IEC 27001 is an international standard for information security management systems rather than an Australian penetration testing regulation. It requires organisations to establish, implement, maintain, and continually improve an information security management system based on information security risks. 

ISO/IEC 27001 does not establish a universal rule that every organisation must conduct a penetration test annually. The organisation determines appropriate security controls and risk treatment based on its information security risk assessment. Technical assessments and control testing can therefore form part of the evidence used to evaluate whether security controls are implemented and operating effectively. 

What this means for penetration testing: Organisations pursuing or maintaining ISO/IEC 27001 certification should determine whether penetration testing is an appropriate control-validation activity based on their risk assessment, systems, threats, and applicable controls.

How Often Should You Conduct Penetration Testing in Australia?

There is no single penetration testing frequency that applies to every Australian organisation. The appropriate testing schedule depends on the applicable regulations, standards, risk profile, technology environment, and changes to systems.

As a practical guide:

Requirement or framework Penetration testing expectation
APRA CPS 234 Systematic testing based on risk; APRA guidance indicates sufficient control coverage at least annually, with controls protecting untrusted environments typically tested throughout the year.
PCI DSS At least annually and after significant changes, subject to the applicable PCI DSS requirements.
Essential Eight Not a general penetration testing mandate; assessments focus on implementation and effectiveness of Essential Eight controls.
Privacy Act / APP 11 No prescribed penetration testing frequency; organisations must take reasonable steps to protect personal information.
SOCI Act Requirements vary by asset and applicable obligations; vulnerability assessments and other assurance activities may apply.
ISO/IEC 27001 No universal penetration testing frequency; testing should be determined through risk assessment and the organisation’s ISMS.

For organisations without a specific regulatory testing schedule, a risk-based penetration testing program is generally more appropriate than treating annual testing as a universal rule. Testing should also be reconsidered after significant application, infrastructure, architecture, cloud, authentication, or network changes, or when the threat environment materially changes.

Want a Sample Penetration Testing Report?

See how our experts document vulnerabilities, risk severity, and clear remediation steps.

Download Sample Report

Security Testing Report

Local Australian vs International Penetration Testing Providers

Choosing between a local Australian penetration testing provider and an international or remote-delivery provider depends on your organisation’s regulatory requirements, data-handling needs, technical requirements, and budget. Neither option is automatically better.

When to Choose an Australian Provider

A local Australian penetration testing company may be the better choice if you:

  • Have data sovereignty or data residency requirements and need testing data and reports to remain in Australia. 
  • Need testers and security teams working in the Australian time zone for real-time collaboration. 
  • Operate in regulated or sensitive sectors such as government, financial services, or critical infrastructure, where Australian presence or local delivery may be relevant to procurement requirements. 
  • Require an ongoing local security partner rather than a one-time penetration test. 

When an International or Remote Provider May Be Suitable

An international penetration testing company can still be a good fit when:

  • You need specialist expertise, such as AI/LLM, cloud, API, mobile, IoT, or a specific technology stack. 
  • Your organisation already works with distributed or offshore security teams
  • You are comparing providers based on technical capability and cost, rather than physical location alone. 
  • The provider can meet your requirements for data handling, confidentiality, tester location, and communication. 

What to Verify Before Choosing a Provider

Whether you choose an Australian or international penetration testing company, verify these points before signing an engagement:

  • Where are the penetration testers physically located? 
  • Where are test data, evidence, and penetration testing reports stored? 
  • Will any subcontractors or offshore teams access your systems or findings? 
  • How is sensitive information protected during and after the engagement? 
  • How long is testing data retained after the penetration test? 
  • Can the provider support your required time zone and reporting requirements? 
  • Does the provider have the accreditation or certifications required by your organisation or regulator? 

Don’t judge a provider’s local presence by its Australian domain, phone number, or marketing claims. Confirm the actual tester location, data-storage location, delivery model, accreditation, and data-handling terms before choosing an Australian penetration testing company or an international provider.

FAQs

1. How much does penetration testing cost in Australia?

Costs vary by scope, but small web application or API tests typically start in the low thousands of dollars; internal network and mobile testing often run higher, and red team engagements can run into the tens of thousands. Get a scoped quote rather than relying on a general figure.

2. How do I choose a penetration testing company in Australia?

Verify accreditation (CREST), confirm manual testing depth, check the retesting policy, review a sample report, and match the provider’s sector experience to your industry.

3. What’s the difference between CREST company accreditation and individual tester certifications?

CREST company accreditation assesses the organisation’s processes, governance and quality systems. Individual certifications (like OSCP or CREST’s individual schemes) assess a specific tester’s technical competency. A credible provider should be able to show both.

4. What is IRAP, and is it the same as penetration testing?

IRAP (Infosec Registered Assessors Program) assesses systems, particularly government and cloud systems, against Australian Government security requirements. It’s a distinct assessment from penetration testing, though some engagements require both.

5. Should Australian companies choose an onshore penetration testing provider?

Only if data sovereignty, local time-zone collaboration, or sector-specific procurement preferences make it a genuine requirement. Otherwise, technical fit and testing depth typically matter more than physical location, but always confirm data handling regardless of provider location.

6. How often should Australian businesses conduct penetration testing?

At least annually, plus after significant infrastructure or application changes, mergers, new product launches, or security incidents. Higher-risk organisations often test quarterly or continuously.

7. What’s the difference between a vulnerability assessment and a penetration testing?

A vulnerability assessment identifies and lists potential weaknesses, typically via automated scanning. A penetration test goes further, manually attempting to exploit those weaknesses to demonstrate real-world impact.

8. How much does web application penetration testing cost in Australia?

Indicative pricing for a small-to-medium web application typically starts in the AUD $3,000–$15,000 range, depending on the number of user roles, application complexity, and testing depth.

9. What should a penetration testing report include?

An executive summary, risk-rated findings with business impact, evidence of exploitation, root cause analysis, actionable remediation guidance, and a clear retesting process.

10. Should I choose a local Australian company or an international provider?

It depends on your priorities. Choose local if data sovereignty or in-region collaboration matter to your organisation; consider an international or remote-delivery specialist if technical specialisation or pricing matter more, but verify data handling either way.

How Qualysec Has Delivered for Australian Businesses: Real Engagements, Independently Verified

We’d rather show you evidence than tell you Qualysec is one of the most trusted penetration testing service providers in Australia. Let’s see what that looks like in practice with two real Australian engagements.

The Challenge

An Australia-based IoT company, building sensor products for industrial and government clients, came to Qualysec because one of their own clients asked for an independent third-party VAPT report before moving forward with the deal. That changed the stakes. This wasn’t an internal checkbox exercise; it was evidence that had to hold up to scrutiny from someone outside the business.

What We Found

Testing covered one web application and one mobile application. Across both, Qualysec identified 50 vulnerabilities: 2 Critical and 3 High:

  • Account takeover via response manipulation (Critical), an attacker could bypass account verification and access another user’s account without credentials
  • Hardcoded API credentials in the mobile app (Critical), extractable from the app package and usable against the backend directly
  • HTTPS not consistently enforced (High), leaving data exposed on unsecured networks
  • Insecure direct object references (High), allowing access to other users’ records
  • Stored XSS across both platforms (High), enabling session hijacking without login credentials

What We Did

Qualysec didn’t stop at the report. Our team worked directly with the client’s developers to close each gap, retested every finding to confirm the fix held, and issued a Letter of Attestation the client could hand straight to their own client as independent proof of a secure platform.

The Outcome

  • 50 findings, 0 open after retesting
  • 2 Critical + 3 High vulnerabilities fully remediated and verified
  • A client-facing attestation ready for third-party review

Independently Verified: Not Just Our Word

This wasn’t a one-off. On one of the trusted B2B review platforms CLUTCH, the Head of Engineering of a Sydney-based platform, rated their engagement with Qualysec a 5.0 across quality, schedule, cost, and willingness to refer, after Qualysec tested their web applications and helped them close every critical and high-risk finding before release.

We’re not going to claim Qualysec is the biggest name in Australian penetration testing. What we can point to is a track record of Australian businesses using Qualysec’s reports to pass scrutiny from their own clients and regulators, which, for a third-party security assessment, is really the only test that matters.

See Qualysec’s full Clutch review profile (4.9/5, 31 reviews)

Chandan Sahoo

About Chandan Sahoo

Chandan Kumar Sahoo is the Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) at Qualysec. With over 8 years of experience in security testing and software quality assurance, he leads corporate strategy and expansion, helping organizations globally secure their web, mobile, and cloud environments.

Leave a Comment.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Blogs

Subscribe to Newsletter

Get the latest cybersecurity insights, compliance tips, and vulnerability reports delivered directly to your inbox.