Making large and small decisions is critical to a business’s success. Decisions come from the need to solve a problem or the need for a potential opportunity. In today’s world, where cyber-attacks are hiding in every corner of applications, CISOs now rely on source code review security service providers.
In this article, we’ve covered source code review in detail- its importance, benefits, working, and best practices. This blog will mainly focus on how a company’s decision maker, CEO, COO, CTO, or CISO can choose the right source code review company to secure their applications and digital assets. Keep reading to choose wisely.
Source Code Review: A Brief Overview
Source code review is a manual or automated technique for inspecting an application’s source code. This testing aims to detect any current security flaws or vulnerabilities. The source code review include security, performance, functional level issues, etc.
Automated code review is when a program automatically evaluates an application’s source code, looking for errors based on a preset set of rules. Automated review can uncover flaws in source code faster than manual inspection.
Manual source code review entails a person inspecting source code line by line to identify flaws. Manual code review clarifies the context for coding decisions. Automated tools are speedier but must consider the developer’s goals or overall business logic. Manual review is more deliberate and addresses particular concerns.
Why is Source Code Review Important for Organizations?
Why is a source code audit necessary? A peer code review provides several advantages to a software development team, including:
- Code review sessions assist in uncovering evident logical problems in source code, ensuring that it is excellent code.
- A code review exercise can determine if the code meets the requirements and design specifications.
- Code reviewers can determine if the code meets the organizational standards and norms.
- Structured code review sessions can reveal if the software is sufficiently maintainable.
- A code review can assist a software development team to determine if it has produced enough test cases.
Code reviews can also provide an organization with the following long-term benefits:
- An expert penetration testing company implementing code reviews enhances its estimating models and tools.
- Because code reviews uncover defects early, the organization has a higher chance of sticking to the project timeline.
- Code reviews alleviate stress on the team.
- Organizations that have introduced code review procedures perceive more knowledge exchange, resulting in more competent coders in the long term.
Read More: SOURCE CODE REVIEW: A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE
Benefits of Performing Source Code Review
Code review is a peer assessment of code before formal testing begins. It is beneficial in various ways, including identifying issues early on. Source Code Review improves communication and teamwork to guarantee high-quality code is provided. Here are the top benefits of reviewing your source code:
1. Ensures Consistency in Implementation
Large projects, unsurprisingly, involve numerous developers. If developers continue to use their coding styles during development, it stifles collaboration and slows overall progress. The code review process requires developers to adhere to specific coding principles throughout the sprint development period.
Code review is important in the long run since team members shift during projects. Furthermore, a consistent coding structure will allow future developers to spend more time developing new features than evaluating current code.
2. Optimizing Code for Higher Performance
Developers need to gain the necessary knowledge; therefore, they are ignorant of certain code optimization strategies that might help them produce clean code. The source code review process allows them to receive appropriate input from expert testers, which helps them refine their coding skill sets.
It also aids in detecting major mistakes or faults, which can lead to serious issues. Because programming is so boring, even the most experienced coders are prone to overlooking errors. Code review helps to eradicate these errors before moving on to the next phases by inviting a new set of eyes to evaluate each code unit.
3. Making the Code More Maintainable
Code review improves the code’s maintainability. It guarantees numerous individuals know the code’s logic and functionality, making it easier to maintain if the original author is absent.
Code review can assist with such instances by checking the generated and desired features. This guarantees that any misconception about the scope or requirements is corrected immediately. This also ensures that teams take advantage of important features.
4. Risk Mitigation
Open source code review is integral to software development projects’ risk reduction strategies. They contribute to the early detection of security vulnerabilities and possible threats in the development lifecycle. You can proactively defend your program from possible risks by resolving these vulnerabilities proactively.
Furthermore, code evaluations verify adherence to industry norms and standards. By thoroughly examining the codebase, you may ensure that your program fulfills the relevant standards, such as data protection, accessibility, or industry-specific rules. Surprisingly, this keeps you on the right side of the law and shields you from possible legal and reputational ramifications.
If you are a business launching an app, application source code review can help you secure your app. Want to know how? Please speak to our expert!
Talk to our Cybersecurity Expert to discuss your specific needs and how we can help your business.
How is the Source Code Review Security Assessment Done?
Businesses should verify that remedies are properly implemented after detecting security problems in the code. Here’s the detailed breakdown of the source code review security assessment procedure:
1. Information Gathering
Gathering information and analysis are the most important aspects of a good code review process. The phase differs between applications due to a variety of reasons. It may be the programming language, the intricacy, or the amount of lines in the code. Another necessity of the phase is to determine the criticality of the application. By doing so, source code security review teams get information about what to emphasize while evaluating.
2. Auto Tool Scanning
An automated scanning procedure inspects each byte of coding using automated tools to produce the desired result. Later, it is compared to the desired outcome to detect any deviations. A static code review team uses automated scanning technologies for specific tasks. Automated scanning technologies must integrate pipelines, tailor to specific demands, and keep false positives to a minimum.
Secure code review tools are quite useful for security experts. Secure code reviews may be carried out using a variety of tools, including:
- Dynamic Analysis Tools (DASTs): These evaluate an application’s behavior while executing.
- Penetration testing: These tools mimic application assaults to uncover flaws that attackers may exploit.
- SAST code review Tools: These tools evaluate an application’s source code without executing it.
- Code Review Checklists: These are lists of probable security flaws that developers may use as a reference while examining their code. They can assist in guaranteeing that all possible vulnerabilities are addressed during the evaluation process.
- Manual Source Code Analysis: While tools are useful, they cannot replace the skill of a human reviewer. Manual code reviews require a skilled security specialist to review the code line by line to find potential vulnerabilities.
3. Manual Pentesting
Manual secure code review testing drills logical problems, poor system settings, and validation attempts into code using line-by-line examination. It also checks for other known flaws in your codebase that are particular to the platform. Human context is important since such testing is performed on high-risk and sensitive applications
4. Reporting
A prioritized action plan for the test results links to the reporting phase. Entities must adhere to the best practices outlined in the source code review report and consolidate any potential deviations in a prioritized strategy. A robust reporting procedure contains an ideal road map for managing the risks connected with the codebase. The review team provides support to developers and the security team as needed.
Get a comprehensive Source Code Review Security report for your business security. Click here!
Latest Penetration Testing Report
How to Choose a Source Code Review Security Company?
Source code review security testing can be conducted both internally and outside. Internal audits necessitate significant expenditures in people resources, techniques, and technology. It is a long process, and entities must evolve their technology and adapt to the current developments.
Code review may be done regularly but demands professional expertise and talent. Similarly, corporations may find it more cost-effective to maintain automatic scanners and updated checklists. Engaging a professional team for source code review services comes with numerous benefits.
Several key factors should be considered when selecting a source code review company for manual verification and ensuring secure code practices. Here’s a breakdown of things businesses should consider before choosing a service provider:
1. Manual Verification
Ensure that the source code review company employs experienced and skilled professionals who can conduct thorough manual penetration testing. Automated tools are valuable, but manual source code analysis is essential for uncovering nuanced issues that automated tools may miss.
2. Proof of Review
The company should provide evidence of the source code review process, such as detailed reports, documentation, and possibly annotated code snippets. This proof ensures transparency and allows you to understand the depth and thoroughness of the review.
3. Zero False Positive Report
While achieving absolute zero false positives may be challenging, a reputable company provides source code audit report that strive to minimize false positives. Evaluate the company’s methodology for distinguishing genuine vulnerabilities from false alarms and inquire about their false positive rate.
4. Recommendations for Secure Code
A good source code review company should identify vulnerabilities and offer recommendations for securing the code. Look for companies that provide actionable advice and secure code review report with best practices to help developers understand and fix the issues found during the review.
5. Help in Fixing
Assess whether the company helps in fixing the identified issues. Some companies provide additional support, such as consulting or collaboration with development teams, to help implement the recommended fixes effectively.
6. Specialist in Source Code Review
Choose a company specializing in source code review with a proven track record in this specific field, such as application, web-based code review, and penetration testing. Experience matters, so inquire about the expertise and background of the reviewers, ensuring they know the programming languages and technologies used in your project.
5 Best Practices of Source Code Review
Effective source code reviews involve more than just finding errors; they also aim to improve code quality, stimulate cooperation, and ensure the long-term success of software projects. It is critical to adhere to best practices throughout the code review process to achieve these objectives.
- During a code review, establish clear objectives: Before beginning a code review, define clear objectives. What are you hoping to achieve with this review? Do you prioritize code quality, adherence to coding standards, or performance optimization?
- Select Reviewers: Wisely involve team members with coding expertise and domain knowledge. Incorporating multiple perspectives can result in more complete evaluations.
- Impose time restrictions: To avoid lengthy assessments, impose time restrictions for each review session. Short, concentrated evaluations are frequently more fruitful.
- Use Code Review Checklists: Create and distribute checklists for reviewers. These checklists might include coding standards, security rules, and project-specific criteria.
- Determine if the code can be maintained: Ensure that your application security code review includes the following aspects:
- Readability: Is the code simple to understand?
- Modularity: Is it well-organized, with functionality neatly separated into functions or classes?
- Extensibility: How easy is it to add or update current features?
Why is Qualysec the Best Source Code Review Service Provider?
“Nothing is more difficult, and therefore more precious, than to be able to decide.” – Napoleon Bonaparte.
If you’re the decision maker of your company, you know how difficult it is to decide and how satisfactory the possibilities can be. When you’re deciding the security of your company’s assets and apps, you can never take the risk of not securing its codes.
Qualysec Technologies is a leading cybersecurity company that solely focuses on penetration testing. We are a leader in app and website source code review, providing the best comprehensive audit reports to help developers identify and fix vulnerabilities.
Qualysec also offers consultation calls if the developer needs help fixing the issue. We take care of the zero false positive report by manually testing the code and finding vulnerabilities and bugs. We have secured more than 300+ applications with our hybrid approach following the combination of manual and automation testing.
Other services include:
- Web App Pentesting
- Mobile App Pentesting
- API Pentesting
- Cloud Security Pentesting
- IoT Device Pentesting
- AI ML Pen testing
We offer businesses customized penetration testing and source code review services per their requirements. If you want your applications, assets, and IT infrastructure to be secure from cyber threats, contact us immediately!
Conclusion
That’s everything for now! We’ve compiled comprehensive information on code reviews and source code review methodology. Source code review is a critical service that keeps enterprises from falling victim to sophisticated risks in their codebase.
A safe code review approach strengthens the program by eliminating code defects and increasing security. It enhances overall quality, aligns the codebase with security considerations, and assists organizations in developing a safe environment for their applications.
Feedback from automated technologies, rule updates, human intelligence, and other factors contribute to web application code review. While security has become a big concern, source code reviews may be useful for search-and-kill.
Get in touch with an expert source code review service provider today!
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is the recommended review for source code?
Efficient source code reviews involve systematically examining software to identify bugs, enhance code quality, and ensure adherence to coding standards. A combination of automated tools and manual inspection is recommended for a comprehensive review that addresses the code’s functional and non-functional aspects.
2. What is secure source code review?
Secure source code review focuses on identifying vulnerabilities and potential security risks within software. This process involves scrutinizing the code for common security pitfalls, such as input validation issues, injection vulnerabilities, and insecure data storage, to ensure robust protection against cyber threats.
3. What is the scope of the code review?
The code review scope encompasses various aspects, including functionality, readability, maintainability, and adherence to coding standards. Security considerations, error handling, and performance optimizations are also crucial components. The scope should be well-defined to balance thorough examination and practical feasibility.
4. How is the code review done?
Code reviews typically involve multiple stages. Initially, automated tools may be used to catch common issues. Subsequently, manual reviews are conducted by developers or a peer team. Discussions around coding practices, design decisions, and potential improvements occur during this phase. Iterative feedback and collaboration among team members are integral to fostering a culture of continuous improvement.
0 Comments