In the present cybersecurity landscape, it measures the demand for security testing vis-a-vis software security. Manual security testing is the most commonly used methodology. Automated testing is another alternative, though not as favored as manual testing. This blog is for those confused Automated vs Manual Pentesting as to which one to choose. We have not made a case for one technique over another, but rather shown how both work and how such works can be given new dimensions in developing better security.
What is exactly a Security Test?
Security testing is an important aspect of quality assurance in the life cycle of software. It is meant to ensure that the product is safe from types of threats such as hacking, viruses, malicious attacks from the outside that may destroy the application’s integrity, loss, destruction of data, or even harm users.
Security testing is a wide term covering many areas of test case creation; penetration testing is the most widely used type of security testing. Penetration testing simulates real attack by an attacker, a hacker attempting to find and report software vulnerabilities.
Security tests ensure that an application has protection against attacks and they play a very significant role in ridding systems from potential calamities. This test happens when the applications detect loopholes or weaknesses with respect to the application. This activity involves rigorous understanding of potential threats and how they can be negated, hence proving to be a tough job.
Security Testing and its types
In the security testing which involved inside penetration testing, it’s a complete test where a “system” tried to get into. It opened up to vulnerabilities which are exploitable by outsiders even your employees. This process could have both manual and automatic methods, all dependent on weightage. Let’s get into it on both levels.
1. The Manual Security Testing
Manual security testing refers to all kinds of testing done by human beings. It is sometimes also called manual penetration testing, manual code review, and black-box testing.
Manual Security Testing has reason and examination from a human point of view to find out the security of a service, a product, or a system: and that does require a tester possessing the knowledge and experience to see conspicuous security vulnerabilities within a system and then performing a series of steps that would exploit the vulnerability to determine if the hackers would be able to exploit it in real-time and on a live system; it will also determine whether this vulnerability is indeed real and needs reporting to the correct personnel within the organization.
Advantages
- Accuracy: The use of manual testing defines that the test is done with the application of critical thinking and creativity with the help of intuition to find certain vulnerable sites, which are usually very complex for automated tools. With a human being, the test will be more adaptive and keep changing given the condition that keeps changing.
- Flexibility: Manual testers explore the system or network thoroughly, demanding different attack vectors and techniques dictated by their expertise and intuition; their education and understanding of the target environment lead them to focus on areas that are most likely to be exploited.
- Contextual Analysis: Analysis of the target system in all its aspects, the business logic, user behavior, and contextual scenarios, is possible through manual testing. This analysis would help in illuminating some possible gaping holes that can be missed by the automated tools.
Disadvantages
- Time: Manual penetration testing is time-consuming; it takes a lot of time for a very complex system or network. The entire process includes multiple steps: reconnaissance, exploitation, reporting, and vulnerability identification, all of which may take weeks and months using significant resources.
- Degree of skill and Expertise: Manual testing is dependent on the skill and expertise of the tester. Not all testers have the same knowledge and experience, so their tests may differ in effectiveness and quality.
- Limited Coverage: Limited scope is present due to time and resource restrictions; manual penetration testing will not take up the whole system or network into consideration. Few places or vulnerabilities end up missing due to which some security gaps might exist.
2. Automated Security Testing
Automated security testing is the procedure of conducting tests on applications for potential security misconfigurations or vulnerabilities. Automated scanning tools are then used to find potential security problems and other vulnerabilities in different applications.
Standalone, Comparator or aggregated Security Testing, companies can carry out automated security testing. Conducting automated security testing as an element of a larger security testing program is more beneficial since automated security tests go on with other manual testing efforts.
Advantages:
- Time savings: automated testing can rapidly crawl large systems or networks, performing repetitive tasks more rapidly than manual testing. It can provide an efficient and high-level overview of common vulnerabilities and possible risks.
- Consistency: Following such scripts or procedures will make an automated tool perform in a consistent way, thereby reducing human error chances. Hence, tests can be reproducible and easily repeated.
- Wide Coverage: It is possible to scan a larger array of systems and networks through automated tools and, therefore test an entire large-scale infrastructure for security. They can assist with identifying common vulnerabilities quickly enough to save manual testers time and effort.
Disadvantages:
- Limited Contextual Analysis: Automated tools cannot comprehend the system’s wider context; they may not consider business logic, user behavior, or specific scenarios.
- False Positives and Negatives: And yes, “get by” may be well suited to false-positive or false-negative generation in such automated tools. This leads to wasting a lot of time and resources because the testers have to go through huge amounts of data, removing the cluttered data.
- Lack of Imagination: Testing will be done through predefined scripts and known attack vectors, which are set up in the automated tools and software used for conducting automated tests. And if there is no evidence or record of a particular zero-day or new vulnerability in the database of that tool’s usage, it may have problems detecting such vulnerabilities.
Automated Security Testing Versus Manual Security Testing:
Both types of security testing have proven advantages and have been used widely in the industry. Let’s break down some basic differences between the two.
Manual Testing:
- Tests performed manually by human testers.
- Test cases and simulations require human testers to perform.
- Useful for exploratory testing Where testers can explore the software and identify potential problems.
- It requires a high level of human expertise, intuition, and creativity.
- Efficient in cases where the software is complex. Requirements change frequently.
- It is time-consuming and expensive.
- Provide detailed feedback on the user experience and usability of the software.
- The scalability and coverage of the test are limited.
- Increased risk of human error and inconsistency in testing.
- Limited ability to test under heavy traffic or user activity.
Automated Security Testing:
- Automated testing using software tools and scripts
- Test cases and simulations are automatically executed by software tools and scripts.
- Useful for repeating tests such as regression testing.
- Expertise in automated testing and scripting is required.
- It is effective in cases where the software has repetitive functions. There are a lot of them, or they change frequently.
- Take action and act faster.
- Limited ability to identify bugs related to user experience or usability.
- Improve the accuracy and coverage of the test.
- Stability and repeatability of test results.
- Useful in load testing. Where the software is tested under heavy traffic or user activity.
Things that influence choosing a penetration testing service provider
While it should really be considered that costs incurred by performing manual or automated penetration tests are varying according to important factors that determine the costs, then, consider these factors as some of the important ones:
The complexity of the System or Network
The complexity is the most important adjective in determining the costs for which a system or network is associated with a test. The testing may of such highly complex environments with multiple layers, interconnected systems, and rather intricate configurations would require much more time and effort, hence resulting in higher pricing.
Scope of Testing
The cost associated with the penetration testing project is quite important influenced by the scope of the project being tested. Naturally, a broader scope making in a much larger number of systems, applications, or network segments would require increased resources and time thus accumulating higher costs.
Testing Methodology
Some methodologies adopted for the tests carried out by penetration testers can have an influence on costs. Different methodologies may require differing levels of effort, expertise and time; for instance, one with a comprehensive, thorough methodology, including extensive manual testing, will take longer and therefore be costlier.
Expertise and Experience
The qualifications, expertise and experience of penetration testers affect the cost too. The more skilled and experienced testers having specific knowledge and certifications charge higher rates. Their proficiency can ensure testing is more accurate and effective and hence reduce the risk of missing critical vulnerabilities.
Reporting and Documentation
Cost is generally influenced by levels of reporting and documentation required. Expensive may be requirements on detailed reports with in-depth analysis, recommendations and remediation steps.
Tech and Tools
Penetration testing can obviously involve the licensing or procurement of tools and technologies that need to be factored in. Some tools may be relatively expensive up-front, while others will be available for subscription purchase. The evaluation of these test instruments should involve consideration of features, capabilities, and support provided by the tools so that their worth against individual test needs can be determined.
Post-Testing Support and Activities
Any future activities or additional support should also be kept in mind. That might include clarifications, re-testing, or even help with finding a way to reduce the damage caused by the problem. Such services will usually come at a cost, so it is important to discuss and ascertain how much it will cost to have such support.
A continual recommendation is, however, having consultations with reputable companies or consultants on behalf of cybersecurity law firms in getting accurate and personalized pricing. When they assess the requirements needed from you, understand the environment you’re operating under, and then give clear pricing details to suit the requirements and budget of your organization.
Qualysec, the Prestigious Penetration Testing Service Provider
It is one of the leading cybersecurity companies in the world. Established in 2020, Qualysec is the one-stop cybersecurity solution for its customers. Qulaysec is also a name synonymous with its sophisticated technologies and expertise in existing cybersecurity assessments. The highly skilled professionals at Qulaysec offer a comprehensive package of services, which includes multifarious vulnerability assessments and penetration tests.
The differentiating factor for Qulaysec vis-a-vis its competition would be that they all live up to date with possible emerging threats and evolving advanced hacking techniques. All this is done by employing the latest tools and employing methodologies that help conduct extremely thorough and accurate assessments. Thus, the team of experienced professionals from Qulaysec comprises not only highly knowledgeable individuals, but also those who bring real-world experience into the context. In turn, this helps build collaboration and provide implementation guidance.
Qualysec technicians are capable of identifying the flaws that could be exploited by fraudsters. Once the flaws are identified, Qualysec works with the organization to devise a strategy for remediation and improvement of the overall security posture of the organization. The list of services provided are as follows:
- Web App Pentesting
- Mobile App Pentesting
- APIs Pentesting
- Cloud Security Pentesting
- IoT Devices Pentesting
- Blockchain Pentesting
So choose Qualysec for a complete and reliable provider of Penetration Testing Service. Also, using their penetration testing guide, you will make informed choices and learn the various factors that affect the cost. Hence, protect your assets and enhance your security posture by choosing us.
Key Features
- More than 3000 tests used to identify and root out all possible vulnerabilities.
- Business logic faults and gaps in security are detected.
- Zero false positives are ensured through manual pen testing.
- Compliance-specific scans for SOC2, HIPAA and ISO27001 standards.
- Provides in-call remediation feedback from experts in security
Qualysec is an accredited Penetration testing service provider. It provides well-rounded penetration testing services as per the specific buiding environments and secures your cloud infrastructure and applications. Their expertise, tools, and methodologies will help organizations unearth the existing vulnerabilities within their systems and establish effective security measures.
Conclusion
Both Automated vs Manual penetration testing have their own benefits and limitations. Manual testing is precise but does not have the speed and often relies on the expertise of the tester. Speed, consistency, and wide geographical coverage result from automated testing, but it cannot identify some complex vulnerabilities and lacks the understanding of the contextual nuances.
Most organizations want to achieve complete security testing by balancing manual and automated methods. Using the advantages of both forms of testing, organizations improve their security posture and limit the chances of exploitation. In the end, it is dictated by the specific needs, resources, and purposes of each organization whether a penetration testing will be manual or automated.
Qualysec is well known for serving a number of clients across numerous domains such as IT. They have trained clients in identifying and overcoming vulnerabilities, preventing data breaches, and improving their overall security posture.
Currently, when it comes to the status of the penetration testing being done in the cybersecurity industry in general, cloud penetration testing would be the style of testing that is talked most about; Qualysec is the organization to go with for that.
FAQ
What is the best type of security testing: manual or automated?
There is actually no single best option when it comes to penetration testing. Manual penetration testing has an intensive test and mostly has zero false positives while automated scans cover a wider area and are faster. The two complement each other in creating a solid security posture for your company.
What is OWASP in penetration testing?
OWASP is not a testing tool; rather, it is a pen testing resource. It provides lists of the ten most critical web application security risks. Pen testers leverage this while testing so as to prioritize vulnerabilities and make sure to cover the area’s most attractive to attackers.
0 Comments